Monday 19 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Investigation Report 200603518

  • Report no:
    200603518
  • Date:
    March 2009
  • Body:
    Glasgow City Council
  • Sector:
    Local Government

Overview

The complainant (Mr C) approached Glasgow City Council (the Council) about problems of dampness he was experiencing in his property. He believed that the source of the dampness was his neighbour (Mr N)'s flat. The Council considered that the water ingress constituted a statutory nuisance and served an Abatement Notice under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, which required Mr N to address the source of the problem. Mr N eventually undertook some work which did not stop the dampness. Mr C believed that the Council unreasonably did not use the powers at their disposal to ensure that Mr N took action that would solve the problem.

Specific complaints and conclusions

The complaints which have been investigated are that the Council:

  • (a) failed to enforce an Abatement Notice effectively (upheld); and
  • (b) failed to keep Mr C adequately informed about progress of the enforcement of the Abatement Notice (no finding).

 Redress and recommendation

The Ombudsman recommends that the Council:

  • (i) apologise to Mr and his wife for a lack of clarity and consistency in their approach to addressing the statutory nuisance; and
  • (ii) reflect on what can be done to address the gap between their statutory responsibilities and customer expectations in situations like this.

Updated: December 11, 2018