Monday 19 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Investigation Report 200503649

  • Report no:
    200503649
  • Date:
    March 2007
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health

Overview

The complainant (Mrs C) raised a number of concerns about the treatment her late husband (Mr C) received at the Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley (Hospital 1) from 1 August 2005 to 15 October 2005.  She had concerns about his clinical treatment; lack of communication between medical and surgical staff and the family and inadequate complaints handling.

Specific complaints and conclusions

The complaints which have been investigated are that:

  • (a)      Mr C' s clinical treatment was inadequate (not upheld);
  • (b)      medical staff failed to communicate between specialities and with the family (partially upheld); and
  • (c)      there was inadequate complaints handling (partially upheld).

Redress and recommendations

The Ombudsman recommends that the Board:

  • (i)       remind staff of the importance of communication with family members;
  • (ii)      conduct an audit to ensure that responses to complaints are within NHS Complaints Procedure Guidelines; and
  • (iii)      conduct an investigation into the circumstances which led to a letter being issued to Mr C nearly three months after his death enquiring whether he wished to remain on the waiting list for orthopaedic surgery and offer a sincere apology to Mrs C for the distress which was caused.  On this point she would also draw to the Board's attention to recommendation (ii) of report 200502722 published in September 2006.

The Board have accepted the recommendations and will act on them accordingly.

Updated: December 11, 2018