Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201303137

  • Case ref:
    201303137
  • Date:
    February 2014
  • Body:
    Scottish Prison Service
  • Sector:
    Prisons
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, action taken by body to remedy, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    policy/administration

Summary

Mr C, who is a prisoner, complained that the prison would not allow him to purchase a postal order to buy a book from an approved supplier. The prison had changed their book purchasing policy. They said that in future postal orders could not be used to pay for books, which had to be purchased from one of their approved suppliers, with payment coming from a prisoner's wage account. Because of the new process, Mr C was no longer able to purchase postal orders. He said that his account with the supplier was in credit, and he wanted to be allowed to buy one last postal order to combine with the credit to buy a book.

We asked the prison if they would allow Mr C to do this. They said they had already given him that opportunity, and were not prepared to allow him to do so again. However, they said Mr C could have the supplier credit reimbursed to his prison account, or could use funds from his wage account to combine with the credit to purchase a book through the prison. We were satisfied the process in place for ordering and paying for books reflected the prison rules and because of that, we did not uphold Mr C’s complaint.

Updated: March 13, 2018