Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201301024

  • Case ref:
    201301024
  • Date:
    February 2014
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - Acute Services Division
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    appointments/admissions (delay, cancellation, waiting lists)

Summary

Mr C was referred to the board's neurosurgical unit after an angiogram (a type of x-ray used to examine blood vessels) showed that he had two cerebral aneurysms (weak points in the walls of blood vessels supplying blood to the brain, causing them to bulge or balloon out). The referral was passed to a consultant neurosurgeon for consideration. Five days later, it was returned to the waiting list team, then passed to another consultant neurosurgeon the same day, for Mr C to be placed on a waiting list initiative list, so that he would be seen sooner.

Mr C, however, collapsed about a week later. He was admitted to hospital and a scan of his head was taken. This showed evidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and the thin tissues that cover the brain). He was taken to theatre for emergency surgery, but this was abandoned due to the continuing bleeding and swelling in his brain. Mr C was then transferred to the intensive care unit, where he died later that day.

Mr C's wife complained about the care and treatment he received from the board before his death. After taking independent advice from one of our medical advisers, we found that it was reasonable for them to at that point put Mr C on the waiting list initiative list, which meant that he would have been seen sooner. The adviser explained that there was no indication from the medical records that Mr C had displayed any symptoms of subarachnoid haemorrhage at that time. We also found that Mr C had received reasonable care and treatment in hospital on the day he died.

Updated: March 13, 2018