Wednesday 21 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201302066

  • Case ref:
    201302066
  • Date:
    August 2014
  • Body:
    Care Inspectorate
  • Sector:
    Scottish Government and Devolved Administration
  • Outcome:
    Some upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    complaints handling

Summary

Mr C complained to the Care Inspectorate about a care provider used by his mother. He was not satisfied that they investigated his complaint effectively, as he said they had not responded to all his concerns. He also had ongoing correspondence with them after they completed their initial investigation and complained that they did not handle this reasonably.

Our investigation found that the Care Inspectorate had thoroughly investigated the issues Mr C raised in his complaints, and responded to each of them. They did not respond to every individual query that he brought to them, but we considered that they took a reasonable approach to their handling of his complaints.

We did, however, consider that after their initial investigation they were not clear enough in their correspondence with Mr C. The should have provided him with consistent information about his complaint and what to do when he was still not satisfied with the outcome.

Recommendations

We recommended that the Care Inspectorate:

  • remind staff to explain to complainants at the outset the remit of an investigation, and clarify the ability to respond to any questions or concerns raised; and
  • apologise to Mr C for the lack of clarity in their decisions and in correspondence with him in relation to the information he requested.

Updated: March 13, 2018