Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision report 201203674

  • Case ref:
    201203674
  • Date:
    July 2013
  • Body:
    A Council
  • Sector:
    Local Government
  • Outcome:
    Upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    primary school

Summary

Mr C complained that the council had unfairly prevented him from seeing his child during the school lunch hour and that their response to his complaint was confused and contradictory. Mr C said that this was particularly unfair as at the time this was his only opportunity to see his children as his estranged wife would not abide by the contact arrangements ordered by the court. Mr C also complained that the council’s response to his complaint contained a number of errors and that he had not been properly involved in the investigation of his complaint. He felt that this showed a lack of care by the council and that his complaint had not been properly investigated.

We carefully considered all the information provided, including the council’s policies about parental involvement in their children’s education when parents have separated. Our investigation found that the council did not have a clear policy covering requests by parents to visit their children during the school day in these circumstances. As a result, council and school staff had given Mr C confusing and contradictory advice.

Although there were typographical errors in the council’s response letter, these were relatively minor and did not affect the conclusion reached. We found the council’s response inadequate, as it failed to acknowledge or apologise for the contradictory advice that Mr C had received. The council had already explained to us that they intended to change their complaints policy after reflecting on this investigation. We upheld Mr C's complaint and made recommendations to address this.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council:

  • apologise in writing for the inconsistent information provided;
  • provide us with evidence that they have reviewed and updated their 'Policy on the Contact between Parents and Schools including non-resident parents' as advised to us;
  • provide us with evidence that the updated policy on parental contact has been disseminated to all head teachers, highlighting the changes to the document; and
  • apologise in writing for failing to respond adequately to Mr C's complaint.

 

Updated: March 13, 2018