Monday 19 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision report 201201818

  • Case ref:
    201201818
  • Date:
    January 2013
  • Body:
    Lothian NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, action taken by body to remedy, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment/diagnosis

Summary

Mr C complained about the board’s management of his wounds. He advised that he had to wait up to four days to have the wound dressings changed, whereas he felt they should be changed every two days. In responding to Mr C, the board indicated that, due to the nature of the skin breaks, the healing tissues should not be disturbed unless necessary.

We took independent advice from one of our clinical advisers, who said that the frequency with which dressings should be changed varies depending on factors such as clinical need, dressing type and physical conditions. Having reviewed the schedule for Mr C's dressing changes, she was content that he was having his wounds cared for in the most appropriate manner. We accepted this advice and did not uphold the complaint. However, we identified that, on occasion, the board had failed to record details of Mr C's dressing changes, and our adviser confirmed that the record keeping could have been better in this case. In responding to our enquiry, the board acknowledged this deficiency, apologised and confirmed they had raised it with the staff involved. We considered this reasonable and had no further recommendations to make.

Updated: March 13, 2018