Monday 19 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision report 201104998

  • Case ref:
    201104998
  • Date:
    September 2012
  • Body:
    Scottish Water
  • Sector:
    Water
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    damage caused / claim for compensation

Summary

Mr C's car struck a large pothole. This caused damage to his car tyre, which had only recently been fitted. It needed replaced. When he telephoned the council to advise them of the road condition they said they already knew about the pothole and would send him a claim form which he completed and returned to them. They then told him, however, that the damage was due to a burst water main, and that they had passed his claim to Scottish Water. However, Scottish Water said that this had been an unforeseen incident outwith their control. They turned down his claim as they said it was not their responsibility, as they had not been told about the problem until the following day.

Mr C considered this unreasonable as the council had the information earlier. He also thought that Scottish Water should have monitored their network and become aware of the problem earlier. Our investigation showed, however, that the fault was indeed not reported to Scottish Water until the next day, and that in terms of their regulatory agreement, Scottish Water were under no obligation to monitor their mains water network. We found that they had handled the matter in line with their normal procedures.

Updated: March 13, 2018