Monday 19 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision report 201103954

  • Case ref:
    201103954
  • Date:
    September 2012
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - Acute Services Division
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mr C had chronic pain in his back and leg which had previously been relieved by epidural injections (injections into the spine to relieve pain or inflammation). In May 2011, he was referred for a further injection. He said that during the procedure the consultant anaesthetist hit bone and a nerve in his back, and had attempted to place the injection several times before placing it 'anywhere he could'. Mr C said that the pain in his back had been intense, and that he now had a permanent numb leg with loss of muscle tone, caused by the inadequate administration of the injection. He felt the procedure had caused him irreparable nerve damage, and he had gone on to have a second opinion and investigatory tests in relation to this from another board area.

After taking advice from our medical adviser, we decided that we could not definitively conclude that Mr C's symptoms were a result of the procedure being performed inadequately. We found that in this type of procedure it was not unusual for several attempts to be made to site a needle, and that bones in the spine could in fact be used as a landmark to help place the injection accurately. We also found that nerve damage was a rare but recognised complication. We did not uphold the complaint but noted that the consent documentation did not record that nerve damage was discussed with Mr C as a potential complication. Although Mr C had not raised this as a specific complaint, we drew it to the board's attention.

Updated: March 13, 2018