Monday 19 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision report 201103887

  • Case ref:
    201103887
  • Date:
    September 2012
  • Body:
    Forth Valley NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, action taken by body to remedy, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    policy/administration

Summary

Mr C complained about the board's decision to relocate the pain management clinic at a hospital. He said that the previous location for the clinic was more accessible for him and because of the relocation he now faced a journey time of over eight hours for a 15 minute appointment. In response to Mr C’s complaint, the board suggested alternative means by which he could attend the clinic but he did not feel they were appropriate. He felt the board had not taken into account his health needs when making the decision to relocate the clinic and complained to us.

We explained that health boards have the authority to take decisions about where to site services within their area. We found that in an effort to address Mr C's concerns, the board had offered Mr C reasonable solutions in order that he could access the clinic where his condition could be assessed. This included information about public transport links and the availability of patient transport services. In addition, the board also offered to pay for a taxi fare for his next appointment but said that the matter would be kept under review. The board also suggested that to avoid the need for travelling, Mr C could have a telephone consultation. We concluded that the board had taken appropriate action to assist Mr C and did not uphold the complaint.

Updated: March 13, 2018