Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201906538

  • Case ref:
    201906538
  • Date:
    September 2020
  • Body:
    Highland NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

C was referred to the ear, nose and throat (ENT) service by their GP practice because they had been suffering from worsening headaches, balance problems and nausea. C was reviewed several times by the ENT service.

C later returned to the practice because their symptoms were not improving. A referral was made to a private healthcare provider for C to see a neurologist. An MRI scan was arranged and following that, C was diagnosed with a brain tumour.

C complained to the board. They felt that the ENT service had failed to adequately investigate their symptoms and, because of that, they failed to diagnose C's brain tumour. In response, the board confirmed it was felt that C was experiencing vestibular migraine (a nervous system problem that causes repeated dizziness), based on the symptoms. It was noted that a neurological examination was not performed at the initial examination, but was carried out at a subsequent review. The board accepted it would have been preferable to perform the neurological examination at the initial appointment, although in C's case it was unlikely to have led to an earlier diagnosis.

We took independent advice from a clinical adviser who is an ENT consultant. We found that the tumour was a rare find in what was a common presentation of vertigo and headaches. It was difficult to know whether or not there would have been any earlier cues to instigate the MRI scan. We noted information from C's first encounter with the ENT service was limited but, overall, the evidence available suggested that the initial diagnosis and treatment were reasonable.

We did not uphold the complaint.

Updated: September 23, 2020