Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201902479

  • Case ref:
    201902479
  • Date:
    October 2020
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - Acute Services Division
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

C complained on behalf of their client (A) who was admitted to the Royal Alexandra Hospital after fainting at home. A CT scan showed that A had suffered a fractured bone in their neck. A was initially fitted with a collar but C complained that this did not fit well and caused A severe pain and discomfort, to the extent that A's neck injury became worse. Due to A's ongoing pain, a further CT scan was carried out which confirmed that the fracture had displaced (not lined up) slightly. A was referred to the spinal unit at another hospital and was fitted with an alternative form of brace. C complained that A should have been referred to the spinal unit from the outset.

We took independent advice from an orthopaedic consultant (a doctor specialising in the treatment of diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system). We considered that the initial investigations and treatment were reasonable. We found evidence that the fitting of the collar was checked by staff. We also considered that the subsequent change to an alternative brace was reasonable, and there was no indication for an earlier referral to the spinal unit. However, we were critical of a delay in reporting the second CT scan. This was an urgent scan which should have been reported within days, but it was not reported for three weeks. This delay did not cause A harm, but it did prolong their pain and discomfort. The treatment of A's injury was otherwise of a good standard and, on balance, we did not uphold this complaint.

Updated: October 21, 2020