Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201905268

  • Case ref:
    201905268
  • Date:
    July 2020
  • Body:
    Grampian NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mrs C, an advice worker, complained on behalf of her client (Ms A) about the treatment which Ms A received following admission to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary with symptoms of right upper quadrant pain and inflammation. Investigations led to a diagnosis of chronic cholecystitis (inflamed gallbladder). Treatment options were considered and it was decided to insert a drain, rather than perform surgery at that time, with a referral to a hepatobiliary surgeon (surgeon specialising in the treatment of the liver, bile duct and pancreas) for ongoing treatment. Ms A was discharged home but was readmitted to hospital as an emergency due to further right upper quadrant pain and required surgery. By the time of readmission, Ms A had not received any correspondence from the surgeon. Ms A said that surgery should have been performed during the initial admission and that the delay in treatment caused her additional health problems.

We took independent advice from a consultant in general surgery. We found that Ms A had multiple medical problems and that upon admission to attempt keyhole surgery would be impossible and open surgery would be challenging. It was appropriate to discharge Ms A with a drain in situation for follow-up by specialists at a later date. Although there were gaps in communication with Ms A, this did not impact on her clinical treatment. We did not uphold the complaint.

Updated: July 22, 2020