Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201808613

  • Case ref:
    201808613
  • Date:
    July 2020
  • Body:
    Forth Valley NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Miss C complained about the antenatal (before a baby's birth) care and treatment she received when she attended Forth Valley Royal Hospital where her child was stillborn at full term.

Miss C raised concerns that, despite attending triage on a number of occasions, in relation to concerns about her blood pressure and possible pre-eclampsia (a pregnancy-related condition involving a combination of raised blood pressure and protein in the urine), she was not adequately supported. Miss C said that she felt that her concerns were not taken seriously, that she received poor continuity of care and that these failings meant that there were missed opportunities to save her baby.

The board said that Miss C was provided with reasonable care and treatment. The board found that staff provided appropriate care and treatment and there was nothing that could have been done to prevent the stillbirth of Miss C's baby. The board also requested an external review to be carried out in relation to Miss C's care.

We took independent advice from two advisers – a midwife and an obstetrician (a doctor who specialises in pregnancy and childbirth).

We found that the midwifery care and treatment given to Miss C was appropriate and in line with relevant guidance. We also found that the obstetric care and treatment given to Miss C was reasonable and in accordance with national guidelines. We found no evidence of missed opportunities which could have affected the outcome in this case and concluded that Miss C's antenatal care was of a high standard. As such, we did not uphold this complaint.

Updated: July 22, 2020