Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201804687

  • Case ref:
    201804687
  • Date:
    November 2019
  • Body:
    Tayside NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mr C complained about the care and treatment the board provided to his late wife (Mrs A). In particular, he was concerned that there had been a delay in diagnosing an occurrence of cancer. In response to Mr C's complaint, the board did not identify any delay in the diagnosis.

Mrs A was initially diagnosed with bowel cancer. Surgery was performed to remove part of Mrs A's bowel, and she also received chemotherapy treatment. Mrs A received follow-up care from the colorectal (conditions of the colon, rectum and anus) and oncology (cancer) teams. In this period, she continued to experience abdominal symptoms. Following an annual surveillance scan, peritoneal cancer (a cancer that develops in a thin layer of tissue that lines the abdomen) was diagnosed. Mrs A received palliative treatment until she later died from her illness.

We received independent advice from a colorectal surgeon and a radiologist (a doctor who specialises in diagnosing and treating disease and injury through the use of medical imaging techniques such as x-rays and other scans). We found that the abdominal symptoms Mrs A experienced were associated with the treatment she received for bowel cancer. We also noted that development of primary peritoneal cancer was very rare. Therefore, we concluded that there was no failing by the board to have identified peritoneal cancer at an earlier stage. We did not uphold this complaint.

Updated: November 20, 2019