Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201804309

  • Case ref:
    201804309
  • Date:
    August 2019
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - Acute Services Division
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mr C complained about the care and treatment his partner (Ms A) received from Glasgow Royal Infirmary for pain in her stomach. He said that the board failed to appropriately diagnose and treat Ms A's health issues within a reasonable time. Mr C's concerns included that for years, Ms A had been passed from one consultant at the hospital to another, without a diagnosis being made for her health condition and appropriate treatment being provided. He was also concerned that the board was now only offering Ms A treatment at the chronic pain clinic.

We obtained independent medical advice from a consultant gastroenterologist (specialism of treatment of the stomach and intestines). We found that Ms A's management had involved numerous specialities and, that all the referrals and the sequence of investigations appeared appropriate and consistent with the clinical guidance referred to in national guidance. We also found that Ms A's regular clinic reviews, and the explanations provided to her at these appointments, seemed appropriate. In terms of the care now being offered to Ms A, we considered that it was appropriate and reasonable. Therefore, we did not uphold the complaint.

Updated: August 21, 2019