Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201707429

  • Case ref:
    201707429
  • Date:
    April 2019
  • Body:
    Borders NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mr C complained about the clinical treatment which he received when he attended Borders General Hospital for treatment for a shoulder injury. He felt he had been seen by staff who were not qualified to treat his injury and that there had been a delay in seeking a surgical option for the injury. He also complained that the x-rays taken were of poor quality and that this had contributed to his delayed recovery.

We took independent advice from a consultant in orthopaedics (a specialist in the treatment of diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system). We found that Mr C had sustained a type of shoulder fracture and that these fractures are treated conservatively, without the need for surgery. Mr C's shoulder injury was initially treated by placing in a collar and cuff sling, and he was seen for follow-ups at clinics. Mr C then developed a mal union (where the bones do not heal up straight) and a stiff shoulder, which are recognised complications of the injury which Mr C had sustained. We also found that Mr C had been seen by appropriately qualified clinicians and allied health professionals and that the x- rays which were taken were of a sufficient quality. We did not uphold Mr C's complaint.

Updated: April 17, 2019