Wednesday 21 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201708551

  • Case ref:
    201708551
  • Date:
    September 2018
  • Body:
    Tayside NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    appointments / admissions (delay / cancellation / waiting lists)

Summary

Mrs C was referred by her GP to the orthopaedic department (the area of medicine which deals with the musculoskeletal system) at Ninewells Hospital for consideration of knee replacement surgery. However, there were problems with the communications from the board which resulted in her missing a scheduled out-patient clinic appointment. Mrs C questioned this with the board and she was told that arrangements had been made to reschedule the clinic appointment. However, she was then told that the rescheduled appointment had been cancelled and that the consultant had carried out a virtual assessment of the symptoms reported by the GP, and had subsequently discharged her. Mrs C complained that it was unreasonable that she had been discharged from the orthopaedic clinic without a face-to-face consultation.

We took independent advice from an orthopaedic consultant. We found that, on occasions, it can be appropriate for clinicians to carry out virtual assessments based on the information provided from the GP referral and that, in Mrs C's case, it was reasonable to discharge her from the clinic without a face-to-face consultation. We did not uphold the complaint. However, we were critical of the letter sent to Mrs C by the consultant as it did not contain sufficient advice as to what alternative options could be considered, and we fed this back to the board for their consideration.

Updated: December 2, 2018