Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201705437

  • Case ref:
    201705437
  • Date:
    September 2018
  • Body:
    Fife NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mrs C complained that the board failed to provide her with appropriate care and treatment during her admission for day surgery at Queen Margaret Hospital. Following a procedure to remove her gallbladder, Mrs C was deemed to be fit to be discharged the same day. A number of days later she became unwell and was diagnosed with a serious infection.

Mrs C raised concern about whether the possibility of infection could have been foreseen and the decision to discharge her on the same day. She questioned why antibiotics were not prescribed and raised concern about the level of information she was given prior to discharge.

We took independent advice from a consultant upper gastrointestinal surgeon (a surgeon who specialises in the upper gastrointestinal tract which includes the gall bladder, liver, pancrease, oesophagus, stomach and small bowel). We found that there was no evidence of failings in the surgery provided to Mrs C. We found that there was no evidence of an active infection at the time Mrs C was discharged, and that it was reasonable, and in line with national guidelines, not to prescribe antibiotics. We did not consider that there was a reason to admit Mrs C overnight and were satisfied that the board had provided appropriate information to Mrs C prior to discharge. We did not uphold the complaint.

Updated: December 2, 2018