Wednesday 21 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201702832

  • Case ref:
    201702832
  • Date:
    June 2018
  • Body:
    Partick Housing Association Ltd
  • Sector:
    Housing Associations
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    repairs and maintenance

Summary

Mr C complained about the service he received from his housing association. He had experienced ongoing issues with his sleep and mental health as a result of noise generated by an extractor fan in the bathroom of the property below him. The property below was privately owned and rented out to tenants. Mr C complained that the housing association unreasonably declined to take appropriate action to address the noise and that the service provided by the association deteriorated after he disclosed his mental health issues to them.

We found that the association liaised with Mr C, the property's owner and the council's noise and environmental health teams to try and reach a solution. The setting of the extractor fan was adjusted but Mr C said that the noise was still impacting on him. The owner of the flat below decided not to allow any further access to the property as the council's environmental team found no issues with the fan. The association no longer had access to the flat below and stated that there was no further action that they could carry out. We considered that the association had taken reasonable steps to resolve the situation and that the owner of the flat below was within their rights to deny access. We also noted that the association's property maintenance manager had inspected the ventilation system and found no faults. Therefore, we considered that the housing association had acted reasonably and did not uphold this aspect of Mr C's complaint.

In relation to the service provided by the association, we found no evidence to suggest that the service had deteriorated after Mr C disclosed his mental health issues. We did not uphold this aspect of Mr C's complaint.

Updated: December 2, 2018