Wednesday 21 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201606644

  • Case ref:
    201606644
  • Date:
    February 2018
  • Body:
    Business Stream
  • Sector:
    Water
  • Outcome:
    Resolved, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    policy / administration

Summary

Mr C complained about Business Stream. Mr C operated a mobile snack van which was located on a car park in a business park. He did not believe he should be liable for water charges as he was not connected to the main water and sewer supply. However, despite Business Stream making requests to Scottish Water for the premises to be de-registered, the premises was deemed eligible as water ran from the roof onto the car park and down the drain.

Mr C complained to us that Business Stream had unreasonably billed him for water charges. We requested all of the relevant information from Business Stream. We sought their views on Mr C's liability and they requested that the case be passed back to them again to make a further de-registration request to Scottish Water. We allowed them to do this but the de-registration request was refused. Business Stream then took the decision to remove all charges on the account given the length of time the issue had been going on and the fact tht Mr C was no longer trading from the premises. They also apologised to Mr C for the inconvenience caused. As the removal of charges and an apology were the outcomes Mr C was seeking from his complaint, we closed his case.

Updated: March 13, 2018