Wednesday 21 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201607796

  • Case ref:
    201607796
  • Date:
    November 2017
  • Body:
    Scottish Prison Service
  • Sector:
    Prisons
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    policy/administration

Summary

Mr C complained that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) failed to appropriately handle his request to have his legal agent's phone number added to his prison phone account. He also complained that the SPS failed to respond appropriately to his complaint about this.

Mr C said that he submitted the appropriate form with details of his request but that the SPS did not have any record of having received it. The SPS said that they only became aware of Mr C's request after an officer, who received a complaint from Mr C, called the business support team to notify them. Mr C said the officer who responded to his complaint indicated that he could call his lawyer, and Mr C said he felt this response indicated that any calls made would be confidential. However, the business support team added Mr C's legal agent's phone number to his account, but because the details could not be verified in the normal way, the number was added as allowed but not private. This meant that any calls made by Mr C to his legal agent could be recorded. The SPS said that they told Mr C that the number would only be added as private when sufficient evidence was provided by him to confirm that the phone number was in fact for his legal agent.

We found that the SPS had handled Mr C's request appropriately and in line with the normal process. We were also satisfied that the SPS had responded appropriately to Mr C's complaint. Therefore, we did not uphold his complaints.

Updated: March 13, 2018