Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201508346

  • Case ref:
    201508346
  • Date:
    March 2017
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - Acute Services Division
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mrs C complained about various aspects of the nursing care she received during an admission to the Royal Alexandra Hospital. This included her concerns about the assistance she received with her personal care, the attitude of staff and the management of her pain.

We took independent nursing advice. The adviser found no evidence to support Mrs C's concerns and considered that the overall nursing care she received appeared reasonable. Therefore we did not uphold Mrs C's complaint.

However, while reasonable efforts appeared to have been made to manage Mrs C's pain, it was noted that she had been refusing pain medication and the nursing adviser considered that staff might have done more to explore the reasons for this with Mrs C. In addition, we considered that some of the language used in the nursing records could be viewed as lacking compassion. We made a recommendation in this regard.

Mrs C also complained about her medical care as she considered that she received inadequate sedation before an attempt to carry out a lumbar puncture (a procedure where a needle is inserted into the lower part of the spine). This initial attempt was abandoned due to Mrs C's distress and the procedure was carried out successfully the following day. We took independent advice from a consultant physician, who considered that the procedure was carried out appropriately and that reasonable steps were taken to try to control Mrs C's pain. They advised that it would be unusual and not in line with routine practice to offer sedation to patients for such a procedure. We did not uphold this complaint.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board:

  • ensure that the staff involved are made aware of, and reflect on, the nursing adviser's comments.

Updated: March 13, 2018