Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201508176

  • Case ref:
    201508176
  • Date:
    February 2017
  • Body:
    Edinburgh College
  • Sector:
    Colleges
  • Outcome:
    Upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    special needs - assessment and provision

Summary

Miss C, a student with additional support needs, complained about the processing of her application and the provision for her additional support needs. The college took over four months to give the correct information to a relevant third party, which delayed Miss C receiving relevant support. The access centre which assessed Miss C, while acting promptly to carry out the assessment, failed to communicate effectively after being informed Miss C had a change of address.

Due to the delays in processing Miss C's application, she was without access to some of the support she needed for longer than necessary. We found that the college failed to reasonably to provide the support Miss C needed and made a recommendation relating to this. The college have acknowledged the findings of this investigation in this regard and apologised to Miss C.

Communication from the college regarding what was required of Miss C in order to obtain additional support was poor. When Miss C complained about her experience regarding arranging and access to additional support, the college took longer than the target time to respond to the complaint. The time taken was deemed not to have been unreasonable given the complexity of the complaint. However, communication from the college to Miss C should have been better, and was largely reactive to contact from Miss C, rather than proactively seeking to update Miss C when the timeline had to be extended. We therefore upheld Miss C's complaint.

Recommendations

We recommended that the college:

  • refund the fees paid for the course.

Updated: March 13, 2018