Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201507701

  • Case ref:
    201507701
  • Date:
    November 2016
  • Body:
    Edinburgh College
  • Sector:
    Colleges
  • Outcome:
    Some upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    special needs - assessment and provision

Summary

Mr and Mrs C complained on behalf of their son (Mr A) who is a former student at Edinburgh College. They complained that although Mr A had been diagnosed as dyslexic, the college delayed in organising the agreed support he needed. They also said that specific agreed support had not been available to him on the day of an exam and that after he received his results, he received inadequate feedback. They complained about the way the college dealt with their formal complaint about these matters.

We investigated the complaint and found no evidence of a delay in the college's processing of Mr A's request for support. However, other agencies were also involved in this, over which the college had no control.

In the meantime, the college updated Mr A's lecturers about his level of support but on the day of an assessment, although a computer was available it did not have a spellcheck facility. A separate room for Mr A's use was also not made available. As these things were part of Mr A's support plan, we upheld this part of the complaint. However, we found no evidence that the college had provided inadequate feedback on his assessment. Like other students, Mr A's papers were returned to him annotated with the marker's comments.

When Mr and Mrs C complained, the college explored details of their concerns with them but took too long in terms of their stated complaints policy to deal with the matter. We upheld this aspect of the complaint.

Recommendations

We recommended that the college:

  • apologise for the delay in responding to the complaint.

Updated: March 13, 2018