Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201501652

  • Case ref:
    201501652
  • Date:
    May 2016
  • Body:
    Lanarkshire NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Some upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Miss C complained to us that staff at Hairmyres Hospital and Monklands Hospital failed to provide her with appropriate and timely treatment, which resulted in the removal of her gallbladder. We took independent advice on this complaint from a medical adviser, who is a consultant general surgeon. We found that Miss C had been investigated and treated appropriately for her gallbladder disease within a reasonable time-frame. Whilst there was a short delay in referring her for a scan and in providing a prescription when she was discharged from hospital, these did not have an adverse impact on her care. In view of this, we did not uphold the complaint.

That said, Miss C's consultant had referred her to another consultant when she made a complaint about him. Miss C's care was not compromised by the change of consultant, but this was not in line with guidance from the General Medical Council (GMC), which states that a doctor should not end a professional relationship with a patient solely because of a complaint the patient has made about them.

Miss C also complained to us that staff in the hospitals had failed to communicate with her adequately throughout the treatment referral process. We found that there had been some failings in relation to communication. We upheld this aspect of Miss C's complaint, although we noted that the board had already apologised to her for these failings.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board:

  • make the consultant aware of the adviser's comments about Miss C's transfer of care to a different consultant being contrary to guidance from the GMC; and
  • provide evidence that the failings identified have been fed back to relevant staff.

Updated: March 13, 2018