Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201500354

  • Case ref:
    201500354
  • Date:
    May 2016
  • Body:
    Fife NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Some upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mrs C complained to us about the care and treatment provided to her late mother (Mrs A) in the Victoria Hospital. We took independent advice on Mrs C's complaints from a consultant geriatrician and a nursing adviser. Mrs C complained that the action taken in relation to the management of Mrs A's pain was unreasonable, particularly as Mrs A had dementia. We found that although there had been no clear cause of Mrs A's pain, medical staff had made reasonable attempts at diagnosing and managing the cause of her pain and it had been reasonably well controlled. There was also evidence in the nursing notes to indicate that nursing staff undertook very specific assessment and management of Mrs A's pain. We did not uphold this aspect of Mrs C's complaint.

Mrs C also complained about the action taken in relation to fluids and diet. We upheld this complaint, as we found that staff had not completed nutritional screening documentation when Mrs A was admitted and that she had repeatedly received the same types of meals. There was also no evidence that staff had taken action when Mrs A's dentures went missing. That said, we were satisfied that the board had apologised for these failings and had taken action to prevent similar problems occurring.

Mrs C also complained about the communication with the family. We found that this had been of an acceptable frequency and detail. We did not uphold this aspect of the complaint. In addition, we found that the end of life care provided to Mrs A had been reasonable and did not uphold Mrs C's complaint about this.

Updated: March 13, 2018