-
Case ref:201500037
-
Date:May 2016
-
Body:Tayside NHS Board
-
Sector:Health
-
Outcome:Not upheld, no recommendations
-
Subject:clinical treatment / diagnosis
Summary
Mrs C raised a number of issues about the care and treatment her late husband (Mr C) received during admissions to Ninewells Hospital and Royal Victoria Hospital.
During our investigation, we took independent advice from a consultant geriatrician and a nursing adviser. We found no evidence that the clinical and nursing care was unreasonable. In particular, the consultant geriatrician noted that Mr C had been suffering from several conditions and had required significant medication to try and control his symptoms, and we found that there had been a number of discussions with Mrs C about her husband's condition. The consultant geriatrician was satisfied that the medication given to Mr C was always appropriately considered, prescribed and administered. While some of the medication caused side effects, the consultant geriatrician was satisfied that the board tried to avoid this medication as much as possible and that the side effects were unavoidable.
The nursing adviser was satisfied that Mr C had been regularly assessed and care was planned for his mobility problems. We were satisfied that the care planning and assessment charts and nursing notes confirmed that Mr C's needs were fully assessed and managed. We did not uphold Mrs C's complaints.