Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201405055

  • Case ref:
    201405055
  • Date:
    May 2016
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - Acute Services Division
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mr A had mental health problems. His mother (Mrs C) complained to us about the care and treatment Mr A received when he attended the Western Infirmary on three occasions after taking overdoses. We took independent advice from a medical adviser, who is a consultant in emergency medicine, and from a psychiatric adviser. We found that the medical care and treatment provided to Mr A when he attended the hospital, along with the care he had received there for his mental health problems, had been reasonable. We did not uphold this aspect of Mrs C's complaint.

Mrs C also complained that staff in the hospital had not treated Mr A with respect and that a member of staff had shouted at him. The notes in the medical records about this specific incident were detailed. However, as always with written records, the exact content of the conversation was impossible to determine and there were differing views of the conversation. There was no clear and objective evidence that a member of staff had shouted at Mr A or that staff had failed to treat him with respect. In the absence of such evidence, we did not uphold this aspect of the complaint.

Finally, Mrs C complained that the follow-up arrangements each time Mr A was discharged from the hospital were unreasonable. We found that Mr A had been physically fit on each occasion that he was discharged, and that the discharge plans in relation to his psychiatric care were reasonable and appropriate. We did not uphold this aspect of Mrs C's complaint.

Updated: March 13, 2018