Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201404954

  • Case ref:
    201404954
  • Date:
    May 2016
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - Acute Services Division
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mrs C's late husband (Mr A) was admitted to Glasgow Royal Infirmary with numerous fractures following a fall. After eight days in hospital, his condition deteriorated and he died of a pulmonary embolism (a clot in the blood vessel that transports blood from the heart to the lungs). Mrs C raised concerns about the orthopaedic, medical and nursing care and treatment provided saying that Mr A had not been given the best opportunity to survive given the failures in care.

We took independent advice from several medical advisers and a nursing adviser. We found that the treatment decisions to reduce the risk of pulmonary embolism were reasonable and that the risks of a pulmonary embolism could not be eliminated completely. Having said that, there was a missed opportunity for a more senior specialised medical review during this period as Mr A's National Early Warning Score (NEWS), a guide used to determine the degree of illness of a patient, was at a level that should have triggered an escalation of clinical care. We also found that there was poor record-keeping, and these failings resulted in unnecessary distress to Mrs C and her husband. In relation to nursing care, we also found record-keeping failings and a failure to alert medical staff of Mr A's deterioration during this period. We upheld Mrs C's complaint.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board:

  • ensure record-keeping by medical staff complies with relevant guidance;
  • bring our findings to the attention of relevant medical staff;
  • take steps to ensure healthcare professionals comply with the NEWS guidelines or clearly set out the rationale in patients' clinical records for non-compliance;
  • ensure record-keeping by nursing staff complies with relevant guidance;
  • bring our findings to the attention of relevant nursing staff; and
  • apologise for the failings identified.

Updated: March 13, 2018