Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201508011

  • Case ref:
    201508011
  • Date:
    June 2016
  • Body:
    Lothian NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Some upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mrs C complained that staff at the minor injuries clinic (MIC) at the Western General Hospital failed to identify that her ankle was broken. She also complained that as part of the board's investigation, the staff member involved gave false information about the advice given to Mrs C when she attended the MIC. Mrs C stated she was advised she could travel while the board stated she was advised travel was not ideal.

We took independent advice from a consultant in emergency medicine. While we found that Mrs C's ankle fracture had been missed when she attended the MIC, the advice we received was that the fracture had not been obvious and it was understandable that it had been missed. However, we were concerned that when the radiologist's report identified the fracture, the board did not contact Mrs C in line with their procedures. We were also concerned that the board failed to explain the reason for the failure in their system in this case. We therefore upheld this part of the complaint and made several recommendations to address the failings we found.

We found no objective evidence to prove or disprove what advice about travel had been given to Mrs C when she attended the MIC. We did not uphold this part of the complaint.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board:

  • provide further information on the system in place for reviewing MIC x-ray reports, correlating them to the interpretation and diagnosis by the practitioner and the system for acting on any missed injuries;
  • provide further information on how any missed injuries are recorded and audited;
  • bring the adviser's comments on the advice to give patients with soft tissue injuries to the attention of the relevant physiotherapy practitioner; and
  • ensure that the physiotherapy practitioner involved in this case is reminded of the requirement to make accurate records of advice given to patients and specifically document any advice given with regards to fitness to travel.

Updated: March 13, 2018