Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201507639

  • Case ref:
    201507639
  • Date:
    June 2016
  • Body:
    Fife NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    communication / staff attitude / dignity / confidentiality

Summary

Ms C complained on behalf of her mother (Mrs A) who had been a patient in Victoria Hospital. Ms C felt that her mother should not have been asked if she agreed to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) being put on her notes, as her mother was in a state of delirium. Ms C said that she, as next of kin, should make the decision, not hospital staff.

We looked at Mrs A's medical records and we took independent advice from an consultant geriatrician. We found that hospital staff had documented their consideration of Mrs A's situation and their actions to a reasonable standard, and they had acted in accordance with the relevant guidance on resuscitation and DNACPR. The guidance is clear that a patient with capacity can consent to or refuse CPR, and if they lack capacity the decision rests not with the next of kin, but with a legally appointed proxy or with the lead clinician. In general terms, overall responsibility for making a decision about CPR rests with the lead clinician. In the circumstances, we did not uphold Ms C's complaint.

Updated: March 13, 2018