Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201406676

  • Case ref:
    201406676
  • Date:
    January 2016
  • Body:
    Fife NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Ms C had gallbladder surgery at the Victoria Hospital. She was discharged without further follow-up but started to experience pain from a wound site. She was referred back to the board by her GP and had further surgery to address this. She was discharged the same day by nursing staff. Ms C complained that she had not been given a follow-up appointment following her initial surgery. She complained that her discharge at the second procedure was inappropriate as she was not reviewed by a member of the medical team. Ms C was also concerned that the board had failed to provide her with appropriate treatment following a further referral from her GP.

After taking independent advice from a nursing adviser and a consultant surgeon, we did not uphold Ms C's complaint about discharge. In relation to her concerns about the lack of follow-up after the first surgery, the surgical adviser confirmed that it is established practice not to offer a clinic appointment in such cases. Regarding the second procedure, we found that it is normal practice for patients to be discharged from day surgery cases without being seen by a doctor. The nursing adviser confirmed that appropriate checks had been carried out before Ms C's discharge. We noted that the board had taken learning from Ms C's complaint and were addressing her concerns about information that was provided to patients at discharge. Although we did not uphold this complaint, we made two recommendations to the board about the action they have taken.

We also did not uphold Ms C's complaint about the treatment she received following her GP referral. The surgical adviser considered that this had been appropriately managed.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board:

  • provide evidence to confirm what action has been taken to improve the provision of information to patients on discharge; and
  • advise us on the outcome of deliberations on offering patients the choice to see a doctor before discharge.

Updated: March 13, 2018