Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201500916

  • Case ref:
    201500916
  • Date:
    February 2016
  • Body:
    Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Some upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mr C was concerned about the care and treatment given to his son (Mr A) by the University Hospital Crosshouse immediately before his death. Mr A had recently been diagnosed with terminal and inoperable cancer. He was told that his time was short. He was admitted to the hospital as an emergency with increasing pain and sickness but he died a few days later. Mr C complained to us that he had not been told how advanced his son's illness was; that his son had no treatment plan; that his son was treated without dignity or privacy; staff were inflexible about visiting times; and that communication was poor.

We took independent advice from a consultant clinical oncologist and from a nurse practitioner. We found that while Mr A's medical care and treatment had been reasonable, there had been poor communication by staff. Mr C should have been informed that Mr A was extremely ill and had very little time. We also found that while arrangements were confirmed with Mr C that he and his wife were able to visit on a more flexible basis, this instruction was not passed to all staff involved. In light of this, we upheld two of Mr C's complaints.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board:

  • make a formal apology for their communication shortcomings;
  • remind the medical team involved in Mr A's care and treatment of their obligations to keep families and carers informed particularly at the end of life; and
  • confirm to us that they are satisfied that such an occurrence would not occur again.

Updated: March 13, 2018