Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201508165

  • Case ref:
    201508165
  • Date:
    August 2016
  • Body:
    Highland NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Some upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Ms C was pregnant with twins when she was taken to Raigmore Maternity Unit by paramedics. She was found to be in premature labour and despite attempts to stop her contractions, her twins were delivered prematurely with very low birth weights. Ms C was 20 weeks pregnant at the time of the delivery and her twins did not survive. Ms C complained about the care and treatment that was provided to her and the twins. She also complained about the information and advice provided by the board on taking the babies away from the hospital. Ms C was concerned about the board's final response to her complaints as she felt this took a long time to be issued and contained a lot of mistakes.

After taking independent advice on this case from a midwife, an obstetrician, a neonatologist and a consultant physician, we did not uphold Ms C's complaints about the care and treatment. The advice we received was that the care was appropriate and no failings were identified in this regard. We also did not uphold her complaint about the information or advice that was given on taking the babies away from the hospital as this was considered to be reasonable in the circumstances. We did, however, make recommendations in this respect.

We upheld Ms C's complaint about the board's final response to her concerns. We found that while the response was issued within a reasonable timescale, there were a number of factual errors with details such as dates.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board:

  • consider the introduction of a booklet for bereaved parents to assist staff in providing information;
  • provide a specific apology for the error in the times of death noted on the removal forms;
  • apologise for the issues identified with their final response; and
  • review their process for fact-checking decisions before issue.

Updated: March 13, 2018