Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201407750

  • Case ref:
    201407750
  • Date:
    September 2015
  • Body:
    A Dental Practice in the Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board area
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Ms C attended her dental practice complaining of pain from her molar tooth. Ms C elected to have an extraction, which was performed under local anaesthetic. During the extraction, the tooth fractured and part of the root was displaced into the maxillary antrum (the space within the upper jaw bone). This had to be removed by surgery. Ms C said it was not reasonable that the tooth fractured during the extraction because the dentist had an x-ray showing the size of the tooth and its position before undertaking the procedure. Ms C complained that she had to attend hospital eight times because she suffered a severe infection which disfigured one side of her face and caused extreme pain.

We took independent advice from our dental adviser. We found that there was no indication that the fractured root would become dislodged and penetrate the antrum, and that this was a well recognised complication of this kind of extraction. However, there was no evidence in Mrs C's dental records that the possible complications of the extraction had been explained to her before the procedure had been carried out. While we were satisfied by the evidence that, overall, the treatment decisions and management were reasonable, we made a recommendation to the practice given the lack of evidence showing that possible complications were explained.

Recommendations

We recommended that the practice:

  • take steps to ensure the possible risks of extraction are adequately explained to patients and recorded in their records.

Updated: March 13, 2018