Thursday 22 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201301769

  • Case ref:
    201301769
  • Date:
    October 2015
  • Body:
    Highland NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mr C complained on behalf of his father (Mr A) who had suffered a stroke following a bleed in his brain which required specialist surgery. He was left with dense weakness in his left side with no active movement. Mr A was an in-patient at Raigmore Hospital for a number of months while he underwent rehabilitation in their stroke unit. When he was discharged, Mr A received physiotherapy at York Day Hospital. He was later seen by a consultant in stroke rehabilitation medicine and a specialist physiotherapist. Mr A also received other physiotherapy in the community. Mr C was unhappy with the range, intensity and frequency of the physiotherapy that Mr A received and complained that the board had failed to provide appropriate rehabilitation following his stroke. The board considered that the rehabilitation they provided was reasonable.

After taking independent advice from a medical adviser who is a consultant in stroke medicine and rehabilitation, we found that the clinical rehabilitation treatment that Mr A had received was appropriate. The advice highlighted an area where communication with the family could have been better but, overall, we considered this element of Mr A's care to be reasonable. We also took independent advice from a physiotherapist specialising in neurological rehabilitation and acute neurology (the science of the nerves and the nervous system, especially of the diseases affecting them). Overall, the range, intensity and frequency of Mr A's physiotherapy was found to be reasonable and the adviser considered that a holistic approach had been taken in relation to his treatment. The physiotherapy advice highlighted a single area of concern where there was no record that an issue identified during an assessment at York Day Hospital was monitored. After taking all the information about Mr A's rehabilitation care and treatment into account, we did not uphold Mr C's complaint but made a recommendation to the board to ensure that lessons are learned from the advisers' comments.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board:

  • draw the comments of the medical adviser on communication and the physiotherapy adviser on best practice to the attention of relevant staff.

Updated: March 13, 2018