Wednesday 21 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201305414

  • Case ref:
    201305414
  • Date:
    May 2015
  • Body:
    Scottish Prison Service
  • Sector:
    Prisons
  • Outcome:
    Some upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    exercise and time in the open air

Summary

Mr C complained to us that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) had failed to provide prisoners with adequate access to weights and cardiovascular (CV) equipment and facilities. This related to the two fitness rooms within a residential hall, a weights room and CV room and the access to the main prison gym. Mr C was concerned about the removal of the weights room and the lack of maintenance of the CV room equipment. He also complained that the SPS failed to provide prisoners with adequate access to the prison's main gym.

We found that there was different access to the main gym, but that the prison has the authority to offer this, as the prison rules allow for different provisions to be in place for prisoners located in different parts of the prison. We did not find evidence that the SPS failed to provide prisoners with adequate access to weights and CV equipment and facilities and did not uphold this aspect of the complaint. However, although the SPS's decision to remove the weights room was discretionary, we were concerned that there was a lack of clarity around the future use of this room.

Mr C also complained about the SPS's handling of his complaint. We found that, in general, the SPS had adequately investigated and responded to the majority of issues Mr C had raised, but we also found that they had failed to adequately respond to his complaint about a member of staff. We were also concerned that some information had not been detailed on the complaint form. In view of these failings we upheld this aspect of his complaint.

Recommendations

We recommended that SPS:

  • apologise for the shortcomings that our investigation identified;
  • remind staff that the reason for refusing a request for assistance should be recorded on the internal complaints committee response; and
  • remind staff involved in handling this complaint that the issue complained about should be adequately investigated in line with prison rules and staff guidance on prisoner complaints and disciplinary appeals.

Updated: March 13, 2018