Wednesday 21 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201405772

  • Case ref:
    201405772
  • Date:
    June 2015
  • Body:
    Scottish Prison Service
  • Sector:
    Prisons
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    downgrading

Summary

Mr C complained that his prison did not give him written notice explaining why he was being removed from his work placement. Mr C also complained that his prison did not use evidence in their decision to place him in secure conditions, did not follow the risk management process, and did not follow the process for reviewing his supervision level.

We found that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) were not required to give Mr C notice that he was being recalled from placement because, in fact, Mr C was not recalled; rather, his placement had finished. In addition, the prison rules did not require notice to be given; rather, it specified that a written explanation should be provided which, because Mr C was not recalled, did not apply in this case.

In terms of the evidence used to put Mr C in secure conditions, we were satisfied that the SPS acted in line with their procedures. The SPS were allowed to evaluate changes in a prisoner’s circumstances or behaviour, using information gathered from relevant sources, to help them consider if a prisoner posed a threat to the security or good order of the prison. We also found that the SPS followed the risk management process and the process for reviewing his supervision level. We did not uphold Mr C’s complaints.

Updated: March 13, 2018