Wednesday 21 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201403651

  • Case ref:
    201403651
  • Date:
    February 2015
  • Body:
    Scottish Prison Service
  • Sector:
    Prisons
  • Outcome:
    Some upheld, action taken by body to remedy, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    home detention

Summary

Mr C complained about the way his application for home detention was dealt with. He told us that the decision was based on outdated information about him. He said that a member of staff involved with the application was a former neighbour. We found that the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) were entitled to take into account information about Mr C's past history. We found that the issue of conflict of interest had been considered and had been dismissed because the person concerned was not involved in decision-making. However, whilst the SPS had explained this to Mr C they had not kept a proper record of the conversation and had not explained it in writing to Mr C.

Mr C told us that the proper process had not been followed in dealing with his appeals. We agreed in reviewing the case that Mr C's appeals had not been logged or responded to in the way they should have. We found that the original reason given to Mr C for the refusal of home detention was incorrect and, in effect, encouraged him to make a new application from a different address which had no prospect of being approved. We upheld this aspect of Mr C's complaint, but as the SPS had accepted their failings and had taken steps taken to address the issues directly with the members of staff concerned, we did not make any recommendations.

Updated: March 13, 2018