Wednesday 21 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201305967

  • Case ref:
    201305967
  • Date:
    October 2014
  • Body:
    Scottish Water
  • Sector:
    Water
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    sewer flooding - external

Summary

Mr C experienced external flooding at his property in early 2014. This had happened before, and in 2010 Scottish Water had put a plan in place to address the problem, which included removing tree roots and regularly checking the section of sewer that was causing the flooding. Mr C felt that this plan was not working, and he wanted a permanent solution to the matter. He complained to us that Scottish Water failed to replace the sewer part that had tree roots in it.

Our investigation considered the actions Scottish Water had already taken and what they proposed to do in order to permanently resolve this. We found that Scottish Water had been thorough in responding to Mr C's complaint. As well as their ongoing maintenance of the affected area over the years, they had recently replaced a section of sewer larger than that the survey had suggested. We also found that Scottish Water had been proactive in finding a long term solution, and planned to resolve the external flooding problem in Mr C's street in 2015, in conjunction with another project to resolve internal flooding issues nearby. We considered their actions to be reasonable in the circumstances and did not uphold Mr C's complaint.

Updated: March 13, 2018