Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201303552

  • Case ref:
    201303552
  • Date:
    May 2014
  • Body:
    Forth Valley NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Upheld, action taken by body to remedy, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    appointments / admissions (delay / cancellation / waiting lists)

Summary

Mr C, who is a prisoner, submitted a request to the prison health centre for an appointment with the mental health team. This was on the advice of the forensic psychologist who was running the offending behaviour programme that Mr C was attending. As Mr C did not receive a response to his request, he complained to the health board. The board told him that the mental health team had assessed his request and decided that he did not need input from them. Mr C did not dispute this decision, but complained to us that the board had not told him about the decision when it was made.

In response to our investigation, the board told us that due to staff shortages in the prison health centre there had been a backlog of referrals at the time Mr C submitted his request. This meant that it was not assessed until almost six weeks later. They confirmed the decision that had been taken but acknowledged that this did not appear to have been communicated to Mr C until he complained. They explained that a reply slip should have been issued, informing Mr C of the decision, and confirmed that they had reminded staff to adhere to this process in future. They also took steps to speak to Mr C and apologise to him. We upheld the complaint, due to the failure to communicate the outcome of the referral to Mr C, but in light of the action already taken by the board to address this, we had no further recommendations to make.

Updated: March 13, 2018