Tuesday 20 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201204958

  • Case ref:
    201204958
  • Date:
    May 2014
  • Body:
    Lothian NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    policy / administration

Summary

Mr C, who is a prisoner, had a stomach ulcer for which he had emergency hospital treatment in January 2012. Helicobacter pylori (a stomach infection) is the most common cause of ulcers and the hospital arranged for him to be tested for infection in March 2012. The results were negative, but Mr C was not made aware of this. He complained that the prison health centre team had not done anything about his ongoing stomach pain and that he had not received his test results or a hospital appointment despite having being referred there in June and October 2012.

We took independent advice on this complaint from one of our medical advisers. We upheld Mr C's complaint, as although we found that the health centre team had prescribed appropriate medication for his symptoms in line with national guidance, we concluded that they had unreasonably delayed in following up his test results with the hospital. We also found that there was a failure in sending a further referral to the hospital requesting that Mr C be re-tested when the hospital apparently told staff that they had no record of a test being done in March 2012. We were unable to clearly establish why Mr C was not told the results of the test carried out in March 2012, nor why it took so long for him to be re-tested.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board:

  • ensure the prison has procedures in place to follow-up test results in a timely manner and, where appropriate, arrange prompt re-testing if necessary; and
  • apologise to Mr C for failing to follow-up his March test results in a timely manner along with prompt re-testing.

Updated: March 13, 2018