Wednesday 21 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201305880

  • Case ref:
    201305880
  • Date:
    July 2014
  • Body:
    University of St Andrews
  • Sector:
    Universities
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    policy/administration

Summary

Ms C, who was a student, asked for a training placement near her home. She explained that she needed this on the grounds of mitigating circumstances, as she had to care for a family member. The university declined her request and placed her in another location. Ms C complained to us that the university unreasonably failed to adhere to their mitigating circumstances criteria in dealing with her request.

We looked at information from Ms C and the university. The university information included their policy for allocating student placements and taking into account mitigating circumstances. It was not, however, for us to say whether Ms C's mitigating circumstances were valid, which was a decision for the university. Our role was to look at whether they dealt with Ms C's mitigating circumstances claim in line with their policy and procedures.

The university explained how the relevant committee considered Ms C's claim, and the evidence showed they did so with empathy. The university also explained why the committee decided that the circumstances Ms C detailed, and the supporting evidence she provided to them, did not meet their mitigating circumstances criteria. We found that they had considered the placement request and Miss C's mitigating circumstances claim in line with their allocation policy.

Updated: March 13, 2018