Wednesday 21 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision Report 201301964

  • Case ref:
    201301964
  • Date:
    July 2014
  • Body:
    North Lanarkshire Council
  • Sector:
    Local Government
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    unauthorised developments: calls for enforcement action/stop and discontinuation notices

Summary

Mr C complained that the council had not taken appropriate action to address a number of concerns he had about a neighbouring development. He said that the boundary fence was unsafe because a large number of nails protruded from it into his property and that there were excavations beside the fence that the developer had not completely filled in. He also complained that the developer failed to properly connect drains to the drainage system of the neighbouring private road.

The council had explained to Mr C that their planning department were satisfied that the fence complied with the approved plans and that the finish of the fence was a private legal matter. They also said that the drainage problem was a matter between residents and the developer, as the road was private.

We fully considered the information from the council and Mr C, and agreed that the issues Mr C raised were essentially private legal matters. We were satisfied that the council's planning and building control team had taken appropriate steps to try and address his concerns, and as we found no evidence of administrative failure in the way the council dealt with this, we did not uphold the complaint.

Updated: March 13, 2018