Monday 19 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision report 201200313

  • Case ref:
    201200313
  • Date:
    September 2012
  • Body:
    Fife NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Some upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    hotel services - food

Summary

Mrs C was unhappy with the quality of the food she received while in hospital. The board said that as she had not reported it to them when she was a patient they were unable to look into her concerns. They said that they had very few complaints about food standards and reported very good results from patient satisfaction surveys.

Mrs C then complained to us about poor food quality and that there was a lack of investigation into her complaint. It is not our role to monitor food quality in hospitals. However, we looked to see whether the food quality was effectively monitored and reviewed by the board. We also looked at the food quality results from patient surveys. In both cases we found that the board achieved high patient satisfaction results. We also noted a number of actions the board was taking in response to issues that had been identified. As the board appeared to achieve good quality food standards, and responded to problems when they arose, we did not uphold this complaint.

We did, however, uphold the complaint about the lack of investigation into Mrs C's concerns, but we did not make recommendations. We felt that the board could have examined whether there were any specific reasons why food quality might have been affected during the period of Mrs C's stay, and that they had missed the opportunity to tell her about the active steps they were taking to improve food quality.

Updated: March 13, 2018