Monday 19 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision report 201103341

  • Case ref:
    201103341
  • Date:
    May 2012
  • Body:
    Scottish Prison Service
  • Sector:
    Prisons
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    visits

Summary
Mr C is a prisoner. In receiving visits from his family, Mr C prefers to use his visit allocation to receive visits only once a month and, therefore, requests double visits. However, the prison will not authorise such a request more than 72 hours in advance. Mr C complained that this was unreasonable.

When we investigated this, the prison advised us that, in the interests of fairness, the 72 hour rule is used to keep spaces open as long as possible to ensure that every prisoner has the opportunity to book at least a single visit. If spaces remain within 72 hours of a visiting time, they will then consider granting requests for double visits. However, they also said that they take a flexible approach and will consider requests more than 72 hours in advance - either in exceptional circumstances or when visitors are travelling a considerable distance.

In Mr C's case, they also said that as he only requires one visit per month and as his visitors travel by public transport, his requests will be considered provided he attaches a referral to the Family Contact Officer quoting the reasons for his request. If he requires more than one visit per month, he would have to revert to the 72 hour rule. We clarified this to Mr C at the end of our investigation. We considered the prison's approach to be reasonable and did not uphold the complaint.

Updated: March 13, 2018