Monday 19 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision report 201104296

  • Case ref:
    201104296
  • Date:
    July 2012
  • Body:
    Grampian NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    Communication, staff attitude, dignity, confidentiality

Summary
Mr C complained that, on two separate occasions, a physiotherapist made inappropriate remarks to him. He also complained that the board's complaint investigation was unfair because it was mostly done by a senior colleague of the physiotherapist.

We obtained Mr C's physiotherapy records and the board's complaint file. However, we were unable to establish whether the remarks had been made. The physiotherapist herself, and one of her colleagues (who had been present on the second occasion) disputed Mr C's account. There were, therefore, no grounds on which we could uphold the complaint about her behaviour.

We explained to Mr C that it was appropriate, under the NHS complaints procedure, for the lead physiotherapist to carry out the investigation. We also explained that she had not been responsible for the complaint decision or the replies to Mr C: they had been drafted by the complaints team and considered, and signed, by the board's chief executive in recognition of his overall responsibility for complaints. The complaint file also showed that the investigation had been thorough and that Mr C had been given a full and fair hearing.

Updated: March 13, 2018