Monday 19 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision report 201103141

  • Case ref:
    201103141
  • Date:
    July 2012
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Some upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    Clinical treatment / Diagnosis

Summary
Ms C has joint power of attorney for her mother (Mrs A). Mrs A has vascular dementia and can become agitated and present challenging behaviour. As she is reluctant to take her medication, her family often disguise it in fruit juice.

Mrs A had a fall and was admitted to hospital. Her daughter complained about the care and treatment her mother received when she was there. She said that the board failed to take her advice about medication and that this led to her mother receiving it intra-muscularly. She complained that this was inappropriate. She also complained that the board failed to proactively manage her mother's care and that this led to a worsening of her condition. She further alleged that her discharge failed and that Mrs A required to be readmitted to hospital.

We obtained advice from one of our medical advisers, a specialist in acute medicine for older people, who read Mrs A's clinical records. We did not uphold the complaint about administering medication as we found no evidence in the notes to suggest that the family had told staff about how they had given this to Mrs A. Our adviser said that, in his view, the notes suggested that the board acted appropriately in the circumstances. However, because the notes omitted information that could have been expected, we decided on balance that the board did not managed Mrs A's condition proactively and upheld that complaint. We also found that the board had handled Mrs A's discharge appropriately but had failed to properly address Mrs C's written complaints as they should have done.

Recommendation
We recommended that the board:
• apologise to Ms C with regard to their failure to proactively manage her mother's care.

Updated: March 13, 2018