Monday 19 October: Complaint form offline

The supplier of our case management system has confirmed that they are experiencing a significant technical issue.

At present, we have no access to the case management system and we are currently unable to provide updates on existing cases.

We are planning on the basis that this could continue for a period of time including for the remainder of this week.

If you would like to check if your complaint is ready for the SPSO or enquire about making a new complaint, please complete our Complaint Checker.  

Please be assured we are doing all we can and will provide updates on our website. 

For an all service update: Service update | SPSO

Decision report 201004338

  • Case ref:
    201004338
  • Date:
    August 2012
  • Body:
    Lothian NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mr and Mrs C complained that, before starting in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment, a hospital gave them inaccurate statistical information about relevant IVF success rates applicable to Mrs C.

The couple said that they followed medical advice and undertook IVF treatment in the knowledge that they had been told that due to Mrs C's age, achieving fertilisation might be more challenging. They said that a clinician had advised that as there were no underlying health issues preventing conception, there remained around a 15 percent chance of success.

Mr and Mrs C said that the IVF treatment resulted in one successful embryo transfer. However, the next day Mrs C became unwell, and the transfer failed. The couple complained that the care and treatment Mrs C received was inadequate. They said that staff failed them; that care procedures were lacking; and that staff misled prospective parents.

We took advice from our medical adviser, who considered all the facts and relevant information and guidance. After careful consideration, we decided that there was no evidence that clinical staff had provided inaccurate information to Mr and Mrs C before IVF treatment began. We also considered that the actions of the ward's out-of-hours service staff were appropriate and adequate.

We also looked at how the board handled Mr and Mrs C's complaint and found that they had appropriately addressed all the issues raised.

Updated: March 13, 2018